Answers Research Journal is totally fair and unbiased....

I mean, clearly if you only publish evidence for creation, then you can clearly deny all evidence for evolution with a clear conscience, right?

From the Answers Research Journal "Instructions for Authors:"

 

"VIII. Paper Review Process

Upon the reception of a paper the editor-in-chief will follow the procedures below:

A

Receive and acknowledge to the author the paper’s receipt.

B

Review the paper for possible inclusion into the ARJ review process.

 

The following criteria will be used in judging papers:

1

Is the paper’s topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model?

2

 

Does the paper’s topic provide an original contribution to the Creation and Flood model?

3

Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework?

4

If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper offer a very

constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative?

5

If the paper is polemical in nature, does it deal with a topic rarely discussed within the origins

debate?

 

6

Does this paper provide evidence of faithfulness to the grammatical-historical/normative interpretation

of Scripture? "